It's your support that makes the difference.
We drive change in Europe.
The Italian government has published a new ‘position paper’ outlining a set of proposals for the future of Eurozone and EU integration. Some of the proposals would require EU Treaty change. Open Europe’s Vincenzo Scarpetta argues that the Italian document shows the demand for further EU reform is growing in other countries – a very encouraging sign for the UK.
23 February 2016
Over the past couple of months, Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi appears to have embraced a far more assertive attitude in his EU policy. His new line can be summarised as follows: Italy has shown it can change, Europe needs to change too.
With this in mind, the Italian government yesterday published a new ‘position paper’ outlining a number of proposals for the future of Eurozone and EU integration – many of which already featured in the Italian contribution to the so-called ‘Five Presidents’ Report’ published last year (see our analysis here).
Unsurprisingly, large part of the document is about the euro area. And it is easy to spot at least one or two hints at Germany, such as:
Fiscal space should be fully used to support growth.
More symmetry is needed in macroeconomic adjustment. Very large current account surpluses have a negative impact on the overall functioning of the Eurozone just as current account deficits.
The Italian government insists on the need to complete the banking union with a joint deposit guarantee scheme. It also reiterates its proposal for a common unemployment benefit scheme and a joint fund to face ‘asymmetric shocks’ in the labour market – that is, to help Eurozone countries experiencing cyclical increases in unemployment.
Looking at the longer term, the Italian proposals include:
Importantly from the UK’s perspective, the document calls for a “fully developed Capital Markets Union” and stresses the importance of deepening the single market with all 28 member states, noting that:
Further integration in the Eurozone and further integration in the EU are, and should be seen, as mutually supporting and beneficial. Convergence within the euro area should not come at the expense of divergence with non-euro member states.
Generally speaking, this new document is in line with what Italy has been saying throughout the UK’s renegotiation: the time is ripe to open a broader discussion on the future of the Eurozone and of the EU at 28. Crucially, some of the proposals listed above would require changing the EU Treaties – something the Italian government seems prepared to do.
From the UK’s point of view, this goes to show the momentum for further EU reform is building up in other member states. Indeed, France and Germany are currently less keen to enter this kind of discussion – as both countries face elections next year. Incidentally, this certainly played a role in gradually narrowing the scope of the UK’s renegotiation to British exceptionalism. However, things will likely look pretty different once the French and German elections are out of the way – and the calls from Rome and elsewhere could fall on more receptive ears.
voting to leave i think was not the right option.
I'm afraid that a point here has beeing glossed over.
What about the "Eurozone finance minister" proposal?
This point follows a previous joint comuniqué from the French and German members of the ECB board, i.e. the French and the German Central Banks.
Is that a move toward a closer-EU, at least a European Monetary Union?
I mean, a European Chancellor of Exchequer (a German, I suppose, or hopefully Mr. Draghi) in touch with the Chancellor of Excequer of the British Union as Mr. Osborne?.
Another "jam tomorrow" exercise.
I'm sure I remember persuasive claims that the Dutch government also wanted something done about "ever closer union", so why has it ended up with just the UK being promised action on that score with the Dutch lined up with the rest against us?
@Denis_Cooper I don't think that it is a jam tomorrow exercise. I think that the Italian government is genuinely trying to start a debate about how the European Union should function in the future. After the German and French elections, I think that you will also see proposals coming out of those countries. Currently the French government does not want to join the debate because it is worried about the Front National.
One of the issues with the Dutch is that they considered the whole UK discussion to be totally irrelevant and narrow-focussed. There is a much larger discussion to be had about the Union, but Cameron was pushing a solution that served domestic political interests rather than the wider questions of increasing competitiveness.
@Rob_Harrison @Denis_Cooper The Italian government and all the other governments have had plenty of time to put forward their proposals for EU "reform" alongside those from the UK, but if they need more time then obviously the UK referendum should be delayed until it has all been thrashed out and we know what we are voting on.
I for one am heartily sick of these constant attempts to string people along.